The CNIC-polypill (acetylsalicylic acid, atorvastatin, and ramipril), an effective and cost-saving secondary prevention strategy compared with other therapeutic options in patients with ischaemic heart disease.

Aims: The retrospective NEPTUNO study evaluated the effectiveness of the Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC)-polypill (including acetylsalicylic acid, ramipril, and atorvastatin) vs. other therapeutic approaches in secondary prevention for cardiovascular (CV) disease. In this substudy, the focus was on the subgroup of patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD). Methods and results: Patients on four strategies: CNIC-polypill, its monocomponents as loose medications, equipotent medications, and other therapies. The primary endpoint was the incidence of recurrent major adverse CV events (MACEs) after 2 years. After matching, 1080 patients were included in each cohort. The CNIC-polypill cohort had a significantly lower incidence of recurrent MACE compared with monocomponents, equipotent drugs, and other therapies cohorts (16.1 vs. 24, 24.4, and 24.3%, respectively; P < 0.001). The hazard ratios (HRs) for recurrent MACE were higher in monocomponents (HR = 1.12; P = 0.042), equipotent drugs (HR = 1.14; P = 0.031), and other therapies cohorts (HR = 1.17; P = 0.016) compared with the CNIC-polypill, with a number needed to treat of 12 patients to prevent a MACE. The CNIC-polypill demonstrated a greater reduction in LDL cholesterol (LDL-c; -56.1 vs. -43.6, -33.3, and -33.2% in the monocomponents, equipotent drugs, and other therapies, respectively; P < 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (-13.7 vs. -11.5, -10.6, and -9.1% in the CNIC-polypill, monocomponents, equipotent drugs, and other therapies, respectively; P < 0.001) compared with other cohorts. The CNIC-polypill intervention was less costly and more effective than any other therapeutic option, with €2317-€2407 cost savings per event prevented. Conclusion: In IHD, the CNIC-polypill exemplifies a guideline-recommended secondary prevention treatment linked to better outcomes and cost saving compared with other therapeutic options.

Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients receiving oral anticoagulants for the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Background: Frequent monitoring of patients declined during the COVID-19 pandemic, harming patients with chronic diseases who critically needed correct monitoring. We evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) receiving treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) in clinical practice in Spain. Methods: This observational, retrospective study analyzed prevalent patients treated with NOAC/VKA on 14/03/2019 (pre-COVID-19 period) and 14/03/2020 (COVID-19 period), who were followed up to 12 months. The study also considered incident patients who started treatment with NOAC/VKA between 15/03/2019 and 13/03/2020 (pre-COVID-19 period) and from 15/03/2020 to 13/03/2021 (COVID-19 period). Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, effectiveness, treatment patterns, and healthcare resource utilization were considered. Results: Prevalent patients amounted to 12,336 and 13,342 patients, whereas 1,612 and 1,602 incident patients were included in the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods, respectively. Prevalent patients treated with VKA had more strokes, thromboembolism, and major bleeding compared to those receiving NOAC, particularly during the COVID-19 period. NOAC patients had a 12 % lower risk of death than those on treatment with VKA (Hazard ratio = 0.88 [95 % CI: 0.81 - 0.95], p = 0.033). In addition, VKA patients were less persistent after 12 months than NOAC patients (pre-COVID-19 period: 52.1 % vs. 78.9 %, p < 0.001; COVID-19 period: 49.2 % vs. 80.3 %, p < 0.001), and required more healthcare visits and hospitalizations than those on treatment with NOAC. Conclusion: Compared to VKA, NOAC seems to have reduced the incidence of severe events and the use of healthcare resources for NVAF, particularly during the pandemic.

Comprehensive Observational Study in a Large Cohort of Asthma Patients after Adding LAMA to ICS/LABA.

INTRODUCTION: Adding LAMA to LABA/ICS is recommended to improve control in patients with persistent asthma. METHODS: This observational, retrospective, before-and-after study considered patients diagnosed with asthma who started LABA/ICS + LAMA treatment (triple therapy, TT) between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018 and had been treated with LABA/ICS (dual therapy, DT) in the year before. Changes in lung function and exacerbation rates, healthcare resource utilization, and healthcare and non-healthcare costs (€2019) were estimated in patients with asthma in clinical practices in Spain. Data from computerized medical records from seven Spanish regions were collected ±1 year of LAMA addition. RESULTS: 4740 patients (64.1 years old [SD: 16.3]) were included. TT reduced the incidence of exacerbations by 16.7% (p < 0.044) and the number of patients with exacerbations by 8.5% (p < 0.001) compared to previous DT. The rate of patients with severe exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids and their hospitalization rates significantly decreased by 22.5% and 29.5%. TT significantly improved FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC, saving €571/patient for society. Younger patients with asthma (18-44 years old) and patients with severe asthma (FEV1 < 60%) performed better upon the initiation of TT. CONCLUSIONS: TT reduced asthma exacerbations, improved lung function and reduced healthcare costs vs. DT, particularly in patients requiring systemic corticosteroids to treat severe exacerbations.

Healthcare resource use and costs reduction with aripiprazole once-monthly in schizophrenia: AMBITION, a real-world study.

Objective: This study aims to compare the hospitalization rate in individuals with schizophrenia who started their treatment with aripiprazole once monthly (AOM400) or atypical oral antipsychotics (OA) in Spain. Methods: This is an observational and retrospective study based on the electronic medical records from the BIG-PAC database. The study population consisted of individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia who initiated their treatment with AOM400 (AOM cohort) or atypical OA (OA cohort) from 01/01/2017 to 31/12/2019. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) procedure was conducted to match individuals of both cohorts. The number and duration of hospitalizations, persistence to treatment, healthcare resources use, and costs were analyzed after 12 months. Results: After the PSM, 1,017 individuals were included in each cohort [age: 41.4 years (SD: 10.6); males: 54.6%]. During the follow-up period, the AOM cohort had a 40% lower risk of hospitalization than the OA group [HR: 0.60 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.49-0.74)]. The median time to the first hospitalization was longer in individuals with AOM400 compared to those with OA (197 days compared to 174 days; p < 0.004), whereas hospital admissions were shorter (AOM400: 6 compared to OA: 11 days; p < 0.001). After 12 months, individuals receiving AOM400 were more persistent than those with OA (64.9% compared to 53.7%; p < 0.001). The OA cohort required more healthcare resources, mainly visits to primary care physicians, specialists, and emergency rooms than those receiving AOM400 (p ≤ 0.005 in all comparisons). AOM400 reduced the costs of hospitalizations, and emergency room, specialist and primary care visits by 50.4, 36.7, 16.1, and 10.9%, respectively, in comparison to the treatment with atypical OA. AOM400 led to annual cost savings of €1,717.9 per individual, from the societal perspective. Conclusion: Aripiprazole once monthly reduces the number and duration of hospitalizations, together with the treatment costs of schizophrenia, as it reduces the use of healthcare resources and productivity losses in these individuals.

Economic Burden Associated with the Treatment with a Cardiovascular Polypill in Secondary Prevention in Spain: Cost-Effectiveness Results of the NEPTUNO Study.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to estimate health-care resources utilization, costs and cost-effectiveness associated with the treatment with CNIC-Polypill as secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) compared to other treatments, in clinical practice in Spain. Patients and Methods: An observational, retrospective study was performed using medical records (economic results [healthcare perspective], NEPTUNO-study; BIG-PAC-database) of patients who initiated secondary prevention between 2015 and 2018. Patients were followed up to 2 years (maximum). Four cohorts were balanced with a propensity-score-matching (PSM): 1) CNIC-Polypill (aspirin+atorvastatin+ramipril), 2) Monocomponents (same separate drugs), 3) Equipotent (equipotent drugs) and 4) Other therapies ([OT], other cardiovascular drugs). Incidence of cardiovascular events, health-care resources utilization and healthcare and non-healthcare costs (2020 Euros) were compared. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios per cardiovascular event avoided were estimated. Results: After PSM, 1614 patients were recruited in each study cohort. The accumulated incidence of cardiovascular events during the 24-month follow-up was lower in the CNIC-Polypill cohort vs the other cohorts (19.8% vs Monocomponents: 23.3%, Equipotent: 25.5% and OT: 26.8%; p<0.01). During the follow-up period, the CNIC-Polypill cohort also reduced the health-care resources utilization per patient compared to the other cohorts, particularly primary care visits (16.6 vs Monocomponents: 18.7, Equipotent: 18.9 and OT: 21.0; p<0.001) and hospitalization days (2.3 vs Monocomponents: 3.4, Equipotent: 3.7 and OT: 4.0; p<0.001). The treatment cost in the CNIC-Polypill cohort was lower than that in the other cohorts (€4668 vs Monocomponents: €5587; Equipotent: €5682 and OT: €6016; p<0.001) (Difference: -€919, -€1014 and -€1348, respectively). Due to the reduction of cardiovascular events and costs, the CNIC-Polypill is a dominant alternative compared to the other treatments. Conclusion: CNIC-Polypill reduces recurrent major cardiovascular events and costs, being a cost-saving strategy as secondary prevention of ASCVD.

Impact of COPD Exacerbations and Burden of Disease in Spain: AVOIDEX Study.

Purpose: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by high morbidity and mortality, with a considerable consumption of healthcare resources (HRU). This study aims to obtain real world evidence regarding the consequences of COPD exacerbations and to provide updated data on the burden of this disease and its treatment. Patients and Methods: A retrospective study in seven Spanish regions was conducted among COPD patients diagnosed between 1/01/2010 and 31/12/2017. The index date was the diagnosis of COPD and patients were followed until lost to follow-up, death or end of the study, whichever occurred first. Patients were classified by patient pattern (incident or prevalent), type and severity of exacerbations, and treatments prescribed. Demographic and clinical characteristics were evaluated, together with the incidence of exacerbations, comorbidities, and the use of HRU, during the baseline (12 months before the index date) and the follow-up periods by incident/prevalent and treatment prescribed. Mortality rate was also measured. Results: The study included 34,557 patients with a mean age of 70 years (standard deviation: 12). The most frequent comorbidities were diabetes, osteoporosis, and anxiety. Most patients received inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) with long-acting beta agonists (LABA), or long-acting muscarinic agonists (LAMA), followed by LABA with LAMA. Incident patients (N=8229; 23.8%) had fewer exacerbations than prevalent patients (N=26328; 76.2%), 0.3 vs 1.2 exacerbations per 100 patient-years. All treatment patterns present a substantial disease burden, which seems to increase with the evolution of the disease (ie moving from initial treatments to combination therapies). The overall mortality rate was 40.2 deaths/1000 patient-years. General practitioner visits and tests were the HRU most frequently required. The frequency and severity of exacerbations positively correlated with the use of HRU. Conclusion: Despite receiving treatment, patients with COPD suffer a considerable burden mainly due to exacerbations and comorbidities, which require a substantial use of HRU.

Disease burden and costs for patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis and chronic moderate-to-severe refractory pain on treatment with strong opioids in Spain.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the disease burden and costs in patients with hip or knee OA and chronic moderate-to-severe refractory pain, receiving strong opioids in Spain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a 36-month longitudinal secondary analysis of the real-word OPIOIDS study. Patients aged ≥18 years with hip or knee OA and chronic moderate-to-severe refractory pain receiving strong opioids were considered. The disease burden included analgesia assessments (NRS scale), cognitive functioning (MMSE scale), basic activities of daily living (Barthel index), and comorbidities (severity and frequency). Costs due to the use of healthcare resources and productivity loss were estimated. RESULTS: 2832 patients were analyzed; age was 72.0 years (SD=14.3), 76.8% were women. Patients had mainly been treated with fentanyl (n=979; 37.6%), tapentadol (n=625; 24.0%), oxycodone (n=572; 22.0%), and buprenorphine (n=425; 16.3%). Pain intensity decreased by 1 point (13.7%), with a 2.6-point decline in the cognitive scale (14.3%, with a 5.3%-increase in patients with cognitive deficit) over a mean treatment period of 384.6 days (SD: 378.8). Barthel scores decreased significantly yielding to a slightly increase in proportion of patients with severe-to-total dependency; 1.2%-2.9%. In the first year of treatment, average healthcare costs were €2013/patient, whereas the average productivity loss cost was €12,227/working-active patient. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Strong opioids resulted in high healthcare costs with a limited reduction in pain, an increase in cognitive deficit, and a slight increase of patients with severe to total dependency over 36 months of treatment.

Disease burden and costs for patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis and chronic moderate-to-severe refractory pain on treatment with strong opioids in Spain / Carga de la enfermedad y costes en pacientes con osteoartritis de cadera y rodilla con dolor crónico refractario moderado-severo tratados con opioides mayores en España

Introduction and objectives: To determine the disease burden and costs in patients with hip or knee OA and chronic moderate-to-severe refractory pain, receiving strong opioids in Spain. Materials and methods: This was a 36-month longitudinal secondary analysis of the real-word OPIOIDS study. Patients aged ≥18 years with hip or knee OA and chronic moderate-to-severe refractory pain receiving strong opioids were considered. The disease burden included analgesia assessments (NRS scale), cognitive functioning (MMSE scale), basic activities of daily living (Barthel index), and comorbidities (severity and frequency). Costs due to the use of healthcare resources and productivity loss were estimated. Results: 2832 patients were analyzed; age was 72.0 years (SD=14.3), 76.8% were women. Patients had mainly been treated with fentanyl (n=979; 37.6%), tapentadol (n=625; 24.0%), oxycodone (n=572; 22.0%), and buprenorphine (n=425; 16.3%). Pain intensity decreased by 1 point (13.7%), with a 2.6-point decline in the cognitive scale (14.3%, with a 5.3%-increase in patients with cognitive deficit) over a mean treatment period of 384.6 days (SD: 378.8). Barthel scores decreased significantly yielding to a slightly increase in proportion of patients with severe-to-total dependency; 1.2%–2.9%. In the first year of treatment, average healthcare costs were €2013/patient, whereas the average productivity loss cost was €12,227/working-active patient. Discussion and conclusions: Strong opioids resulted in high healthcare costs with a limited reduction in pain, an increase in cognitive deficit, and a slight increase of patients with severe to total dependency over 36 months of treatment.(AU)

Introducción y objetivos: Determinar la carga de la enfermedad y los costes en pacientes con osteoartritis de cadera y rodilla y dolor crónico refractario moderado-severo, en tratamiento con opioides mayores en España. Materiales y métodos: Se trata de un subanálisis de 36 meses de duración, procedente del estudio observacional OPIOIDS. Participaron pacientes con una edad ≥18 años, diagnosticados con osteoartritis de cadera y rodilla y dolor crónico refractario moderado-severo, en tratamiento con opioides mayores. La carga de la enfermedad incluyó la evaluación de la analgesia (escala NRS), del funcionamiento cognitivo (escala MMSE), de la capacidad para realizar las actividades de la vida diaria (índice de Barthel) y de las comorbilidades (gravedad y frecuencia). También se estimaron los costes asociados al uso de recursos sanitarios y a la productividad laboral. Resultados: Se analizaron 2.832 pacientes (edad: 72,0 años [DE: 14,3]; mujeres: 76,8%), que habían sido principalmente tratados con fentanilo (n=979; 37,6%), tapentadol (n=625; 24,0%), oxicodona (n=572; 22,0%) y buprenorfina (n=425; 16,3%). La intensidad del dolor disminuyó una unidad (13,7%), con una reducción de 2,6 unidades en la escala cognitiva (14,3% y aumento del 5,3% en los pacientes con déficit cognitivo) durante una media de 384,6 días (DE: 378,8). Las puntuaciones en la escala de Barthel disminuyeron significativamente, con un ligero aumento en la proporción de pacientes con dependencia grave/total, entre 1,2% y 2,9%. En el primer año, los costes sanitarios medios fueron 2.013€/paciente, mientras que los costes medios de pérdida de productividad fueron 12.227€/trabajador. Discusión y conclusiones: El tratamiento con opioides mayores durante 36 meses implicó elevados costes sanitarios, con una eficacia analgésica limitada, un aumento del déficit cognitivo y un ligero aumento de los pacientes con dependencia grave/total.(AU)

Epidemiology and resource use in Spanish type 2 diabetes patients without previous cardiorenal disease: CaReMe Spain study summary.

AIMS: To determine the first manifestation of cardiovascular or kidney disease (CVKD) and associated resource use in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients during seven years of follow-up. METHODS: Observational-retrospective secondary data study using medical records of patients aged ≥18 years with T2DM and without prior CVKD between 2013 and 2019. The index date was 01/01/2013 (fixed date). The manifestation of CVKD was defined by the first diagnosis of heart-failure (HF), chronic-kidney disease (CKD), myocardial-infarction (MI), stroke or peripheral-artery disease (PAD). The main variables were baseline characteristics, manifestation of CVKD, mortality, resource use and costs. Descriptive analyses and Cox model were applied to the data. RESULTS: 26,542 patients were selected (mean age: 66.6 years, women: 47.8%, mean duration of T2DM: 17.1 years). 18.7% (N=4974) developed a first CVKD manifestation during the seven years [distribution: HF (22.4%), CKD (36.6%), MI (14.5%), stroke (15.3%) and PAD (11.3%)]. Overall mortality was 8.3% (N=2214). The mortality risk of the group that developed HF or CKD as the first manifestation compared to the CVKD-free cohort was higher [HR: 2.5 (95% CI: 1.8-3.4) and 1.8 (95% CI: 1.4-2.3)], respectively. The cumulative costs per patient of HF (€50,942.80) and CKD (€48,979.20) were higher than MI (€47,343.20) and stroke (€47,070.30) and similar to PAD (€51,240.00) vs. €13,098.90 in patients who did not develop CVKD, p<0.001. CONCLUSIONS: In T2DM patients, HF and CKD were the first most common manifestations and had higher mortality and re-hospitalisation rates. HF and CKD were associated with the highest resource use and costs for the Spanish National-Health-System.

Clinical and Economic Impact of Long-Term Inhaled Corticosteroid Withdrawal in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treated with Triple Therapy in Spain.

Purpose: To determine the clinical and economic impact of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) withdrawal in Spanish patients with COPD receiving triple therapy (TT) with ICS, long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA), and long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA). Patients and Methods: This was an observational, retrospective study of BIG-PAC database medical records. Patients aged ≥40 years receiving TT from 2016 to 2018 were followed for 1 year. Two cohorts were identified: patients continuing TT (ICS+LABA+LAMA), and patients receiving TT with ICS withdrawn (LABA+LAMA). Variables included medication, exacerbations (moderate and severe), pneumonia, mortality, health resource use (HRU), and cost per patient/year. Cohorts were compared using propensity score matching (PSM). Multivariate statistical analysis using analysis of covariance and Cox proportional risks was conducted. Results: Of 6541 patients included, 5740 (87.8%) continued TT and 801 (12.2%) had ICS withdrawn. Patients with ICS withdrawal were younger, had lower disease burden, higher ICS doses, and more exacerbations compared with those continuing ICS. PSM matched 795 patients in each cohort. Mean age was 68.5 years (SD: 11.2), 69.9% were male, and mean Charlson index was 2.0. Patients with ICS withdrawal had more total exacerbations in the 12 months following withdrawal compared with patients continuing TT (36.6% vs 31.4%; p=0.030). No significant differences were found for pneumonia (3.3% vs 3.6%; p=0.583) and mortality (9.9% vs 7.5%; p=0.092). Median time to first exacerbation was shorter in patients with ICS withdrawal compared with those continuing ICS (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.57-0.83; p<0.001). Mean health cost per patient/year among patients with ICS withdrawal was higher than those continuing TT (€2993 vs €2130; p<0.001). Conclusion: ICS withdrawal in patients with COPD receiving TT was associated with increased exacerbations, HRU, and costs compared with continuing TT, with health and economic impacts on patients and the Spanish National Healthcare System, respectively. Pneumonia and mortality rates were similar between groups.

Treatment patterns and use of healthcare resources of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and hypercholesterolemia and patients with familial hypercholesterolemia in Spain: Protocol of the Reality study.

Background: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) and dyslipidemia are associated to a higher risk of cardiovascular events, mortality, use of healthcare resources and costs. In Spain, the evidence about the administration of lipid-lowering treatments in clinical practice, and their clinical effectiveness in patients with ASCVD and hypercholesterolemia and patients with FH is scarce. Therefore, a multidisciplinary working group of cardiologists, family physicians, internal medicine specialists and neurologists was gathered for the Reality study. The aim of this study is to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and concomitant medication of patients with ASCVD and hypercholesterolemia and of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). The use of healthcare resources and costs associated to the management of these diseases after their diagnosis were also considered. Methods: This is an observational and retrospective study, based on the BIG-PAC® database, which includes the electronic medical registries (EMRs) of 1.8 million people from 7 Autonomous Communities in Spain (including public primary care centers and hospitals). The study includes patients who had a new or recurrent episode of ASCVD during the recruitment period (from 01/01/2017 to 31/12/2018). The index date will be defined as the date of the ASCVD event, and the follow-up period will be 24 months. According to their first diagnosis in the database, patients will be classified as ASCVD (5 groups: stable/unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and peripheral arterial disease) or FH. Discussion: This study aims to analyze the treatment patterns and use of healthcare resources of ASCVD and FH in Spain. The prevalence of these disorders will also be estimated. Due to the high morbidity and mortality associated with these diseases, it is expected that our study will provide useful information for healthcare systems and decision makers to improve the management of these disabling diseases.

Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Persistence, and Outcomes Among Patients With COPD Treated With Single- or Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy: A Retrospective Analysis in Spain.

BACKGROUND: COPD is a leading cause of death and disability. COPD therapy goals include reducing exacerbations and improving symptom control. Single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) or multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) is indicated for patients with frequent exacerbations despite bronchodilator therapy. No available evidence compares SITT vs MITT in Spain in terms of treatment persistence, exacerbations, and other outcomes. RESEARCH QUESTION: Do COPD patients in Spain initiating SITT vs MITT have improved persistence, exacerbations, and health care resource utilization? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This real-world, observational, retrospective cohort study analyzed electronic health records in the Spanish National Healthcare System BIG-PAC database to identify COPD patients aged ≥ 40 years initiating SITT or MITT (using two or three inhalers) between June 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019. Comparative data on persistence (allowing up to 60 days without prescription refill), exacerbation rates, and health care resource utilization and costs during 12-month follow-up were analyzed. Multivariate adjusted analyses were performed. RESULTS: Eligible patients (N = 4,625) initiating SITT (n = 1,011) or MITT (n = 3,614) had a mean age of 70.9 years; most were male (73.9%) with mainly moderate (62.0%) or severe (26.5%) airflow limitation. Between-cohort baseline characteristics were similar. At 12-month follow-up, SITT patients had higher persistence (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.22-1.53; P < .001), reduced risk of exacerbations (HR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.61-0.77; P = .001), and lower all-cause mortality risk (HR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.63-0.71, P = .027), compared with MITT patients. SITT was associated with significantly reduced health care resource use (mean annual cost savings: €403 vs MITT). For both SITT and MITT, persistence was associated with improved exacerbation rates vs nonpersistence, and substantial adjusted mean annual cost savings (€2,115 and €2,700, respectively). INTERPRETATION: Patients initiating SITT had a clinically relevant improvement in persistence leading to reductions in mortality, incidence of exacerbations, and health care resource use with consequent mean cost savings.

Persistence, use of resources and costs in patients under migraine preventive treatment: the PERSEC study.

BACKGROUND: Migraine represents a serious burden for national health systems. However, preventive treatment is not optimally applied to reduce the severity and frequency of headache attacks and the related expenses. Our aim was to assess the persistence to traditional migraine prophylaxis available in Spain and its relationship with the healthcare resource use (HRU) and costs. METHODS: Retrospective observational study with retrospective cohort design of individuals with migraine treated with oral preventive medication for the first time from 01/01/2016 to 30/06/2018. One-year follow-up information was retrieved from the Big-Pac™ database. According to their one-year persistence to oral prophylaxis, two study groups were created and describe regarding HRU and healthcare direct and indirect costs using 95% confidence intervals (CI). The analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed as a sensitivity analysis. Patients were considered persistent if they continued on preventive treatment until the end of the study or switched medications within 60 days or less since the last prescription. Non-persistent were those who permanently discontinued or re-initiated a treatment after 60 days. RESULTS: Seven thousand eight hundred sixty-six patients started preventive treatment (mean age (SD) 48.2 (14.8) and 80.4% women), of whom 2,545 (32.4%) were persistent for 6 months and 2,390 (30.4%) for 12 months. Most used first-line preventive treatments were antidepressants (3,642; 46.3%) followed by antiepileptics (1,738; 22.1%) and beta-blockers (1,399; 17.8%). The acute treatments prescribed concomitantly with preventives were NSAIDs (4,530; 57.6%), followed by triptans (2,217; 28.2%). First-time preventive treatment prescribers were mostly primary care physicians (6,044; 76.8%) followed by neurologists (1,221; 15.5%). Non-persistent patients required a higher number of primary care visits (mean difference (95%CI): 3.0 (2.6;3.4)) and days of sick leave (2.7 (0.8;4.5)) than the persistent ones. The mean annual expenditure was €622 (415; 829) higher in patients who not persisted on migraine prophylactic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed a high discontinuation rate for migraine prophylaxis which is related to an increase in HRU and costs for non-persistent patients. These results suggest that the treatment adherence implies not only a clinical benefit but also a reduction in HRU and costs.

Achieving Lower LDL-C Levels After a Recent Myocardial Infarction Might Be Associated with Lower Healthcare Resource Use and Costs in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: There is little evidence on the relationship between achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and costs in patients on lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). We described healthcare resource use and costs (direct and indirect) by achieved LDL-C in patients receiving LLT after a recent myocardial infarction (MI) in Spain. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of anonymized electronic medical records from seven regions in Spain (BIG-PAC® database; n = 1.9 million). Eligible patients were adults (≥ 18 years) hospitalized for an MI between January 2015 and December 2017, treated with a statin and/or ezetimibe, and having recorded LDL-C values at baseline and during follow-up. Healthcare resource use and direct and indirect costs (in 2018, €) were described by achieved LDL-C levels during a follow-up of 18 months. RESULTS: Of 6025 patients (mean age, 69.7 years; 77% male), only 11% achieved LDL-C goals as defined in the 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines (< 70 mg/dL), and just 1% reached the lower target (< 55 mg/dL) in the current 2019 guidelines. Achieving lower LDL-C levels translated to lower healthcare resource use and costs. Mean total (direct and indirect) costs ranged from €5044 for patients with LDL-C < 55 mg/dL to €7567 for patients with LDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL. CONCLUSION: Very few patients achieved recommended LDL-C goals despite using LLT. Achieving lower LDL-C levels after an MI might be associated with lower healthcare resource use and costs. Use of more intensive LLT, leading to greater reductions in LDL-C, could therefore be beneficial both from a clinical and an economic perspective.

Treatment persistence and exacerbations in patients with asthma initiating treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and beta-adrenergic agonists: retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine treatment persistence and exacerbations in patients initiating inhaler treatment with fixed-dose combinations of inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting beta-2-adrenergic agonists (ICS/LABA) for the treatment of asthma. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study conducted by review of electronic medical records (database: Fundación RediSS). SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. The follow-up period was 1 year. PARTICIPANTS: The study included patients aged ≥18 years who started treatment with ICS/LABA and met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The study groups were fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL), beclomethasone/formoterol (BDP/FORM), budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FORM), fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) and fluticasone propionate/formoterol (FP/FORM). The main measurements were persistence, medication possession ratio (MPR) and exacerbations. Statistical significance was established as p<0.05. RESULTS: In total, 3203 patients were recruited for the study. By groups, 31.1% FP/SAL, 28.6% BDP/FORM, 25.0% BUD/FORM, 8.2% FF/VI and 7.0% FP/FORM. The mean age was 52.2 years, 60.8% were female and 44.9% had persistent-moderate asthma. Treatment persistence was 61.7% (95% CI 60.0% to 63.4%) and by study group it was FP/SAL: 60.7%, BDP/FORM: 61.2%, BUD/FORM: 60.3%, FF/VI: 66.7% and FP/FORM: 67.6% (p=0.046). MPR by study group was FP/SAL: 74.3%, BDP/FORM: 73.8%, BUD/FORM: 74.6%, FF/VI: 79.4% and FP/FORM: 80.6% (p=0.028). The mortality rate was 2.9%. By treatment group, exacerbations were FP/SAL: 21.9% (95% CI 19.3% to 24.5%), BDP/FORM: 22.2% (95% CI 19.5% to 24.9%), BUD/FORM: 22.8% (95% CI 19.9% to 25.7%), FF/VI: 17.9% (95% CI 14.9% to 20.7%) and FP/FORM: 16.0% (95% CI 12.2% to 19.3%), p=0.036. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing treatment with FP/FORM and FF/VI versus FP/SAL, BDP/FORM and BUD/FORM were associated with greater treatment adherence (persistence, MPR) and lower rates of exacerbations. However, further studies will be needed to strengthen the consistency of the results.

Sick Leave and Costs in Active Workers with Chronic Osteoarthritis Pain in Spain: Outcomes of the OPIOIDS Real World Study.

Purpose: To estimate the number of sick leave days and productivity costs in active workers with osteoarthritis (OA) who initiated opioid treatment for moderate/severe chronic pain in clinical practice in Spain. Patients and Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the longitudinal, retrospective OPIOIDS study, using electronic medical records (EMR) of patients aged ≥18 years, who started an opioid treatment for moderate/severe chronic OA pain between 2010 and 2015 after treatment failure with ≥1 first-line drugs (acetaminophen, metamizole and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]). The number of days of sick leave and productivity costs were analyzed during a follow-up period of 36 months. Results: A total of 5089 patients with moderate/severe chronic OA pain, aged 56.8 years (standard deviation [SD]: 4.6) (56.6% were female), were analyzed: 73.3% of them started a treatment with weak opioids and 26.7% of them were treated with strong opioids. At 36 months, adherence was 21.0% (strong opioids: 15.4%; weak opioids: 23.0%; p<0.001), and 77% of patients had at least one sick leave related with chronic OA pain, with an average of 93 days off work in all working patients (120.5 days in patients with sick leaves). Besides, 16.9% of the study population had sick leave periods that lasted at least 6 months. Pain reduction was modest (-1.2 points; -4.0%, p<0.001). The cost of sick leave was €2594 patient/year, and factors such as older age (ß=0.043), female sex (ß=0.036), comorbidities (ß=0.035) and strong opioid use (ß=0.031) were associated with higher productivity costs (p<0.05 in all associations). Conclusion: Active workers who started opioid treatment for moderate/severe chronic OA pain showed an increased frequency of sick leave and productivity cost, with a modest effect on pain relief. Older age, female sex, comorbidities, and strong opioids were associated with higher costs for society.

Epidemiología y tratamiento de la insuficiencia cardiaca en España: estudio PATHWAYS-HF / Epidemiology and treatment of heart failure in Spain: the HF-PATHWAYS study

Introducción y objetivos: Describir la epidemiología y el tratamiento administrado recientemente a una amplia cohorte de pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca (IC).Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de base poblacional, realizado utilizando la base de datos BIG-PAC, que incluye a personas de edad ≥ 18 años que solicitaron atención por IC en 2017-2019. Las principales variables fueron: prevalencia/incidencia-anual, comorbilidades, variables clínicas y medicación administrada.Resultados: Se identificó a 19.762 pacientes con IC de un total de 1.189.003 sujetos que requirieron atención médica en 2017-2019 (en 2019, media de edad, 78,3 años; el 53,0% varones). De ellos, la distribución por tipo de fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo (FEVI) fue: el 51,7% con FEVI reducida, el 40,2% con FEVI conservada y el 8,1% con FEVI en rango medio. En el año 2019, la prevalencia fue del 1,89% (IC95%, 1,70-2,08), con una tasa de incidencia de 2,78 casos nuevos por cada 1.000 sujetos/año. No se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en prevalencia y/o incidencia durante el periodo 2017-2019. De los pacientes con IC-FEr, solo un 64% tomaba bloqueadores beta; el 80,5%, inhibidores de la enzima de conversión de la angiotensina/antagonistas del receptor de la angiotensina II o sacubitrilo-valsartán, y un 29,8%, un antialdosterónico. Además, desde el diagnóstico (basal) hasta los 24 meses de seguimiento, se muestra una discreta optimización del tratamiento, más destacada entre los primeros 3-6 meses.Conclusiones: Los datos epidemiológicos se mantienen estables, con una prevalencia inferior a la reportada en estudios de base no poblacional. Existe un amplio margen de mejora en la optimización del tratamiento médico de la IC-FEr (AU)

Introduction and objectives: To describe the epidemiology and treatment of a large contemporary cohort of patients with heart failure (HF).Methods: Observational, retrospective, population-based study using the BIG-PAC database, which includes people aged ≥ 18 years seeking care for HF between 2017 and 2019. The main variables were the prevalence/annual incidence rate, comorbidities, clinical variables, and medication administered.Results: We identified 19 762 patients with HF from a total of 1 189 003 persons seeking medical attention from 2017 to 2019 (2019: mean age, 78.3 years; 53.0% men). Distribution by type of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was as follows: 51.7% reduced, 40.2% preserved, and 8.1% mid-range. In 2019, the prevalence was 1.89% (95%CI, 1.70-2.08), with an incidence rate of 2.78 new cases per 1000 persons/y. No statistically significant differences were observed in prevalence and/or incidence from 2017 to 2019. Among patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 64% received beta-blockers, 80.5% angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers or sacubitril-valsartan, and 29.8% an aldosterone antagonist. In addition, from the diagnosis (baseline) to 24 months of follow-up, there was discreet treatment optimization, which was notable in the first 3 to 6 months.Conclusions: Epidemiological data on HF remained stable during the study period, with a lower prevalence than that reported in non–population-based studies. There is wide room for improvement in the optimization of medical treatment of HFrEF (AU)

Concomitant use of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) and central nervous system drugs in patients with hepatitis C virus infection. / Uso concomitante de antivirales de acción directa (AAD) y fármacos con acción sobre el sistema nervioso central: Consideraciones en el perfil actual del paciente con hepatitis C.

Our objective was to determine potential drug interactions (DI) between pangenotypic direct-acting antivirals (pDAA) and concomitant central nervous system (CNS) medication in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). Transversal design. Patients aged ≥ 18 years on treatment with pDAA during 2017 were included. The variables collected were comorbidity, concomitant CNS medication and potential DI. The pDAA analyzed were a) Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), b) Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) and c) Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX). Descriptive statistical analysis. We recruited 1,170 patients (mean age 60.1 years, 56.4% male). Mean concomitant drug use was 3.2 per patient/year. The percentages of potential / possible DI between the DAAs and the concomitant drugs on the CNS were: 2.7% contraindications, 11.3% significant and 4.2% weak. By pDAA, the percentages were: SOF/VEL (2.7%; 0.0%; 4.4%), GLE/GDP (2.7%; 26.5%; 1.6%) SOF/VEL/VOX (2.7%; 6.8%; 4.4%), respectively. Concomitant CNS medication was used in one third of HCV patients. It is important to select a pDAA with a low rate of potential DI to simplify treatment. SOF/VEL is a good alternative compared with the other pDAA studied, mainly due to the concomitant use of antipsychotics and analgesics.

El objetivo fue determinar las potenciales interacciones farmacológicas (IF) entre los antivirales de acción-directa pangenotípicos (AADp) y la medicación-concomitante sobre el sistema nervioso central (SNC) asociada a los pacientes portadores del virus de la hepatitis C crónica (VHC). Se realizó un diseño transversal. Se incluyeron pacientes ≥18 años en tratamiento con AADp durante el año 2017. Las variables recogidas fueron: comorbilidad, medicación-concomitante (SNC) y potenciales IF. Los AADp analizados fueron: a) Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), b) Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) y c) Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX). Análisis-estadístico descriptivo. Se reclutaron 1.170 pacientes; edad-media de 60,1 años y el 56,4% varones. El promedio de medicamentos-concomitantes fue de 3,2 por paciente/año. El porcentaje de potenciales/posibles IF entre los AADp y los medicamentos-concomitantes sobre el SNC fueron: 2,7% contraindicaciones, 11,3% significativas y 4,2% débiles. En función de los AADp, estos porcentajes fueron los siguientes: SOF/VEL (2,7%; 0,0%; 4,4%), GLE/PIB (2,7%; 26,5%; 1,6%) y SOF/VEL/VOX (2,7%; 6,8%; 4,4%), respectivamente. Un tercio de los pacientes con VHC muestran un uso de medicación-concomitante de acción sobre el SNC. Será importante seleccionar un AADp que tenga una baja tasa de potenciales IF para simplificar el tratamiento. SOF/VEL se presenta como una buena alternativa en comparación con los AADp seleccionados, principalmente en el uso concomitante de antipsicóticos y analgésicos.

Epidemiology and treatment of heart failure in Spain: the HF-PATHWAYS study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To describe the epidemiology and treatment of a large contemporary cohort of patients with heart failure (HF). METHODS: Observational, retrospective, population-based study using the BIG-PAC database, which includes people aged ≥ 18 years seeking care for HF between 2017 and 2019. The main variables were the prevalence/annual incidence rate, comorbidities, clinical variables, and medication administered. RESULTS: We identified 19 762 patients with HF from a total of 1 189 003 persons seeking medical attention from 2017 to 2019 (2019: mean age, 78.3 years; 53.0% men). Distribution by type of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was as follows: 51.7% reduced, 40.2% preserved, and 8.1% mid-range. In 2019, the prevalence was 1.89% (95%CI, 1.70-2.08), with an incidence rate of 2.78 new cases per 1000 persons/y. No statistically significant differences were observed in prevalence and/or incidence from 2017 to 2019. Among patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 64% received beta-blockers, 80.5% angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers or sacubitril-valsartan, and 29.8% an aldosterone antagonist. In addition, from the diagnosis (baseline) to 24 months of follow-up, there was discreet treatment optimization, which was notable in the first 3 to 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Epidemiological data on HF remained stable during the study period, with a lower prevalence than that reported in non-population-based studies. There is wide room for improvement in the optimization of medical treatment of HFrEF.